"specific, substantial and credible"

Key facts

  • This site cites agencies, standards bodies, patent records, and national-lab material so readers can verify claims at the source.
  • The source library favors U.S. government, national-lab, standards, and patent records over forums or promotional pages.
  • This page cites 17 primary sources and treats patents as claim documents, not performance proof.

How to use this library

Each source on this site is used for a specific job. NASA Glenn pages ground the thermodynamic boundary. NIST pages ground units, uncertainty, and measurement discipline. USPTO pages explain what patents can show. EIA, DOE, and NREL pages ground legitimate energy technologies.

No source is asked to prove more than it can prove. A patent record can document a claim. It cannot prove net energy. A renewable-energy statistics page can document energy sources. It cannot validate a magnet motor. A thermodynamics explainer can state the boundary. It cannot replace a device-specific test.

Source categories

The strongest free-energy writing separates source categories: physical law, measurement method, patent/legal status, energy statistics, technology research, and individual claim documents. Mixing those categories is a common way weak arguments look stronger than they are.

When an article on this site says a claim needs a test, it links to the measurement protocol. When it says a term has a legitimate technical meaning, it links to a thermodynamic or energy source. When it discusses a patent, it treats the patent as a document to inspect.

What would improve this source base

The best possible addition would be independent, raw-data-rich test reports for specific devices, including failures. Negative results are useful when the setup is well documented. They help future readers avoid repeating measurement mistakes.

Another useful addition would be public datasets for small ambient-energy harvesters, electrolyzers, heat pumps, and generator tests, all reported with uncertainty budgets. Free-energy research improves when claims become comparable measurements.

FAQ

Why does the site favor primary sources?

Primary sources reduce the risk of inherited errors and let readers verify the exact claim being made.

Are forums and videos useless?

No. They can surface claims worth investigating, but they usually are not enough to establish net energy performance.

Cite this page

Free Energy Research. "Primary Source Library." Updated 2026-07-12. Accessed from https://freeenergyresearch.org/sources/.

https://freeenergyresearch.org/sources/

Primary sources